Chhattisgarh High Court
SA/791/2017 of Samaru Vs Sushila on 14 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44762
2026:CGHC:44762 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 791 of 2017 1 – Samaru, S/o. Late Shauki Lal Bareth, Aged About 42 Years, R/o. Village Kathli, P.O. Taparda, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 – Narayan, S/o. Late Shauki Lal, Aged About 30 Years,
CGHC010202012017
2026:CGHC:44762
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SA No. 791 of 2017
1 – Samaru, S/o. Late Shauki Lal Bareth, Aged About 42 Years, R/o. Village Kathli, P.O. Taparda, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
2 – Narayan, S/o. Late Shauki Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o. Village Kathli, P.O. Taparda, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
3 – Guruwari, Wd/o. Shauki Lal, Aged About 70 Years, R/o. Village Kathli, P.O. Taparda, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
4 – Nurpati, W/o. Chhotu @ Nilambar, Aged About 36 Years, D/o. Shaukilal, R/o. Village Linjir, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
...............Plaintiffs
... Petitioners
versus
1 – Sushila, W/o. Kushwa Bareth, Aged About 45 Years, R/o. Chandani Chowk, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
2 – Dropati, W/o. Shauki Lal, Aged About 39 Years, R/o. Sulawi, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
3- State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
...............Defendants
... Respondents
Page 1 of 2
For Appellants
:
None appeared.
For Respondent No.3
:
Mr. Sanjeev Pandey, Dy. A.G.
(Single Bench)
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant
Order on Board
15.10.2026
1. This second appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment & decree dated 30.06.2016 passed by the learned Fifth Additional District Judge, Raigarh in Civil Appeal No.48/16.
2. Earlier on 25.03.2025, none appeared on behalf of the appellants and even today also, when the matter is called for hearing twice, none appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellants; therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, this second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/- (Sushma Sawant)
Judge Ashok
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…