Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5260/2026 of SHIV KUMAR AGRAWAL Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 13 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44501 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5260 of 2026 Shiv Kumar Agrawal S/o. Ishwar Prasad Agrawal Aged About 45 Years Occupation- Business, R/o.- Gajanandpura, Raigarh, Tahsil And District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh
CGHC010388712026
2026:CGHC:44501
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5260 of 2026
Shiv Kumar Agrawal S/o. Ishwar Prasad Agrawal Aged About 45 Years Occupation- Business, R/o.- Gajanandpura, Raigarh, Tahsil And District- Raigarh (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur
(C.G.)
2 - The Collector Janjgir-Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)
3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)/ Land Acquisition Officer Tahsil- Dabhra, District- Janjgir-Champa
(C.G.)
4 - The Tahsildar Tahsil- Dabhra, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)
5 - Saraswati Wd/o. Late Gajraj Singh Aged About 65 Years R/o.
Bilaigarh (Sidhwa), Tahsil Dabhra Police Station Chandrapur, District- Sakti
(C.G.)
6 - Shakuntala Wd/o. Late Chaitan Aged About 50 Years Caste
Aghariya, R/o. Bilaigarh (Sidhwa), Tahsil Dabhra, Police Station Chandrapur District- Sakti (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Shri Abhishek Saraf, Advocate
For Respondent(s) :
Shri Shobhit Mishra, Dy. G.A.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 14/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned State counsel submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner has already been decided vide letter dated 12.10.2026 and places the said letter on record.
2. The letter dated 12.10.2026 is taken on record.
3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition.
4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Madhurima