Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRC/9198/2026 of DEEPESH RAO Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 13 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44559 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9198 of 2026 * - Deepesh Rao Son Of Ramarao Aged About 20 Years Resident Of Village Rajasevaiya, Police Station Pithora, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Applicant Versus * - State Of Chhattisgarh Through
CGHC010384412026
2026:CGHC:44559
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 9198 of 2026
* - Deepesh Rao Son Of Ramarao Aged About 20 Years Resident Of Village Rajasevaiya, Police Station Pithora, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund
(C.G.)
... Applicant
Versus
* - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Of Excise Circle, Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.).
... Non-Applicant
For Applicant
:
Mr. Vikram Pratap, Advocate
For Non-Applicant
:
Ms. Laxmin Kashyap, Panel Lawyer
Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 14/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The applicant has preferred this first bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 as he is in jail since 15.08.2026 in connection with Crime No. 88/2026 registered in Excise Circle Pithora, District Mahasamund (CG) for commission of offence punishable under Section 34(2) of CG Excise Act.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant was found in possession of 33.120 bulk liters of illicit country made liquor without having valid license and accordingly, the offence has been registered against the applicant and he was arrested on 15.08.2026.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant would contend that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated. He would also submit that liquor has not been seized from exclusive possession of applicant. He would contend that the applicant has no criminal antecedent, he is languishing in jail since 15.08.2026 and charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, he may be released on regular bail.
4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposed the bail application of present applicant. She would submit that the applicant has no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet has already been filed.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the quantity of liquor seized from the applicant, charge-sheet has already been filed, the applicant is in jail from 15.08.2026 and he has no criminal antecedent, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the present applicant. Accordingly, the instant bail application of the applicant is allowed.
7. It is directed that in the event of the applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- I. He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such fact to the Court;
II. He shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to a fair and expeditious trial;
III. He shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till the disposal of the trial; and,
IV. He shall not involve himself in any offence of a similar nature in future.
8. The observation made in the course of this order is only for considering the case of the applicant on the application for the grant of regular bail. The concerned trial Court shall not be influenced or bound by any observation made in the course of this order.
9. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti