Chhattisgarh High Court

SA/541/2017 of Smt. Rameshwari Devi Vs Tekram on 13 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

3 In SA-541-2017 CGHC010017242017 2026:CGHC:44509 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 541 of 2017 Smt. Rameshwari Devi Wd/o Late Yogendra Dev Gupta @ Mulshankar Gupta, Aged About 61 Years Occupation Agriculturist And House Wife, R/o Village Jhalmala, Patwari Halka No. 18, Tahsil

In

SA-541-2017

CGHC010017242017

2026:CGHC:44509

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

SA No. 541 of 2017

Smt. Rameshwari Devi Wd/o Late Yogendra Dev Gupta @ Mulshankar Gupta, Aged About 61 Years Occupation Agriculturist And House Wife, R/o Village Jhalmala, Patwari Halka No. 18, Tahsil Berla, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.............. Plaintiff, Chhattisgarh

... Appellant

Versus

1 - Tekram S/o Shri Tulsiram Aged About 36 Years Agriculturists, R/o Village Ranka, Tahsil Berla, Ditrict Durg, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh 2 - Netram Aged About 34 Years Since Decease Through Legal Heirs Agriculturists, R/o Village Ranka, Tahsil Berla, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2.1 - Smt. Pyari Bai, Wd/o Late Netram, Aged About 55 Years Agriculturists, R/o Village Ranka, Tahsil Berla, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

2.2 - Parasram S/o Netram, Aged About 19 Years Agriculturists, R/o Village Ranka, Tahsil Berla, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

2.3 - Mohit Ram, S/o Netram, Aged About 27 Years Agriculturists, R/o Village Ranka, Tahsil Berla, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

3 - Arjun S/o Shri Tulsidas Aged About 32 Years Agriculturists, R/o Village Ranka, Tahsil Berla, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Awadharam, S/o Shri Tulsiram Aged About 30 Years Agriculturists, R/o Village Ranka, Tahsil Berla, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District :

Durg, Chhattisgarh

5 - Panchram S/o Shri Tulsiram Aged About 28 Years Agriculturists, R/o Village Ranka, Tahsil Berla, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District :

Durg, Chhattisgarh

SAIFAN

KHAN

Digitally

signed by

SAIFAN

KHAN

In

SA-541-2017

6 - Ramkumar, S/o Shri Tulsiram Aged About 26 Years Agriculturists, R/o Village Ranka, Tahsil Berla, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District :

Durg, Chhattisgarh

7 - Rajaram, S/o Shri Tulsiram Aged About 24 Years Agriculturists, R/o Village Ranka, Tahsil Berla, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 8 - Rajendra, S/o Shri Tulsiram Aged About 22 Years Agriculturists, R/o Village Ranka, Tahsil Berla, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District :

Durg, Chhattisgarh

9 - Alakhram, S/o Shri Tulsiram Aged About 20 Years Agriculturists, R/o Village Ranka, Tahsil Berla, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District :

Durg, Chhattisgarh

10 - State Of Madhya Pradesh Now Chhattisgarh Through The District Collector, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

... Respondents

Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant :

None in two rounds.

For Respondents/State

:

Ms. K. Radhika, Panel Lawyer

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single Bench: Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Sushma Sawant Order of Board 14.10.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This second appeal has been preferred by the appellant/plaintiff- Smt. Rameshwari Devi under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short the “CPC”) feeling aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 21.07.2017 (Annexure-A/2), passed by the first appellate Court in CA No.11- A/2015 (Smt. Rameshwari Devi v. Tekram and others), by which her first appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 26.02.2015 (Annexure-A/1), passed by the learned trial Court in

In SA-541-2017 CS No.22-A/2015 (Smt. Rameshwari Devi v. Tekram and others), has been dismissed.

2. It transpires from the record of the case that on the last date of listing of this matter i.e. on 15.09.2025, SPC was issued to the appellant. However, today neither appellant- Smt. Rameshwari Devi appeared in person nor she is being represented by her counsel. Indeed, the SPC has been returned with an endorsement that appellant- Smt. Rameshwari Devi died 06 years prior.

3. Accordingly, since sole appellant- Smt. Rameshwari Devi had died and no steps has been taken to bring her legal representatives on record, the appeal could not be proceed further.

4. Under such circumstances, the Court is left with no other option but to disposed of this petition having being abated. sd/-

(Sushma Sawant) JUDGE S@if

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead