Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/6246/2026 of RAJESH KUMAR CHOUHAN Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 13 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44423 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6246 of 2026 Rajesh Kumar Chouhan S/o Late Shri Hoshiyar Singh Chouhan Aged About 40 Years Occupation - Gram Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Kosamnara Jila Panchayat - Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) Petitioner(s)
CGHC010324842026
2026:CGHC:44423
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 6246 of 2026
Rajesh Kumar Chouhan S/o Late Shri Hoshiyar Singh Chouhan Aged About 40
Years Occupation - Gram Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Kosamnara Jila Panchayat - Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.)
Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary Department Of Panchayat Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District- Raipur
(C.G.)
2 - Collector, Raigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.)
3 - Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat - Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.)
4 - Shri Shatrughan Jaiswal Gram Panchayat Secretary, Village Panchayat Sangeetrai, Block And District- Raigarh (C.G.)
Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from CIS)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anubhav Vatsa, Advocate
For Resp/State
:
Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, PL
For Resp No.3.
:
Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Advocate
For Intervener
:
Mr. M.K. Sinha, Advocate
(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU)
Order on Board
14.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order, which is under challenge in the present writ petition, has already been cancelled, as evident from Annexure R/1 at page No. 6 of the reply filed by the respondents. In view of the aforesaid development, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU)
JUDGE Rahul