Chhattisgarh High Court
WA/993/2026 of MANISH KUMAR GHORE (IN PERSON) Vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BILASPUR on 13 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44399-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 993 of 2026 Manish Kumar Ghore (In Person) S/o Ishwar Lal Ghore Aged About 48 Years R/o Nariyal Kothi, Dayalband, Jila Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur Aayukt Ke Madhyam Se
CGHC010289792026
2026:CGHC:44399-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WA No. 993 of 2026
Manish Kumar Ghore (In Person) S/o Ishwar Lal Ghore Aged About 48 Years R/o Nariyal Kothi, Dayalband, Jila Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Appellant
versus
Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur Aayukt Ke Madhyam Se Jila Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Janopyogi Sthayi Lok Adalat, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent
For Appellant
:
Mr. Manish Kumar Ghore, in person.
For Respondent
:
Ms. Preeti Yadav, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.
Hon’ble Shri Krushna Ram Mohapatra, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Santosh Sharma, Judge Judgment on Board Per Krushna Ram Mohapatra, Chief Justice
14.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Manish Kumar Ghore, appellant who appears in person as well as Ms. Preeti Yadav, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. This writ appeal has been filed against the order dated 15.06.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(227) No. 246/2023. Since the writ appeal has been filed against an order passed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, the writ appeal is not maintainable in view of the proviso to Section 2(1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006. Hence, the writ appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.
3. The appellant, if so advised, may work out his remedy in accordance with law. Sd/- Sd/- (Santosh Sharma) (Krushna Ram Mohapatra) Judge Chief Justice Preeti