Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/7487/2026 of SMT. BHANUPRIYA MANDAVI Vs STATE GOVT. OF C.G. on 12 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44177 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7487 of 2026 Smt. Bhanupriya Mandavi W/o Raju Lal Mandavi Aged About 33 Years Lecturer (L.B.), Govt. High School Borgaon, Block Dondi, District Balod C.G., R/o Village Rengadabri, Tahsil Dondi - Lohara, Ward No. 6,
CGHC010393762026
2026:CGHC:44177
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 7487 of 2026
Smt. Bhanupriya Mandavi W/o Raju Lal Mandavi Aged About 33 Years Lecturer (L.B.), Govt. High School Borgaon, Block Dondi, District Balod
C.G., R/o Village Rengadabri, Tahsil Dondi - Lohara, Ward No. 6, Bajrang Nagar, District Balod (C.G.)
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Govt. Of C.G. Through - The Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, P.S. Rakhi, New Raipur, Distt.
Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Director Public Instructions Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur (C.G.)
3 - Joint Director Education Division Durg District Durg (C.G.)
4 - District Education Officer Balod, District Balod, (C.G.)
5 - Har Narayan Sahu Working As Lecturer (L.B.), Govt. High School, Borgaon, Block Dondi, Distt. Balod (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title is taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate
For Respondent/ State : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 13/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the pending representation dated 17.10.2025 (Annexure P-10) submitted by the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 17.10.2025 before the respondent authority/ respondent No.2- Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, C.G. questioning her transfer order dated 12.06.2025 (Annexure P/1), however, the said representation is still pending consideration. He further submits that the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities is arbitrary and unjustified. Therefore, the petitioner prays for a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the pending representation in accordance with law.
3. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that if the representation (Annexure P-10) of the petitioner is still pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and the policy of the State Government, within the stipulated period.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the submission made by learned State counsel, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities particularly the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the pending representation dated 17.10.2025 (Annexure P-10) submitted by the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law and the policy of the State Government, preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru)
JUDGE $. Bhilwar