Chhattisgarh High Court
CRR/944/2018 of MUKESH Vs MR. C. CHANDRAMAULI on 12 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44327 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Revision No. 944 of 2018 Mukesh, S/o Shri Chandra Shekhar GondaleAged About 48 Years, Secretary General All Census SC/ST Employee Welfare Association, R/o O/o Directorate Of Census Operation, Govind Sarang Parisar, New
CGHC010262512018
2026:CGHC:44327
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Criminal Revision No. 944 of 2018
Mukesh, S/o Shri Chandra Shekhar GondaleAged About 48 Years, Secretary General All Census SC/ST Employee Welfare Association, R/o O/o Directorate Of Census Operation, Govind Sarang Parisar, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur (CG) ... Applicant
versus
1 - Mr. C. Chandramauli (Ex) Registrar General Of India, O/o Registrar General Of India, 2-A, Mansing Road, New Delhi 110011, 2 - Mr. S Shailesh Registrar General Of India, O/o Registrar General Of India, 2-A, Mansing Road, New Delhi 110011
3 - Mr. Mohan S. Thapa Technical Director (EDP) O/o Registrar General Of India, New Delhi 110011 ... Non-Applicants For Applicant : Shri Sanjeev Verma, Advocate.
For Non-Applicants : None.
Hon'ble Shri
Sudhir Kumar
, Judge
Order on Board
SISTLA
NEELIMA
VISHNU
PRIYA
Digitally signed
by SISTLA
NEELIMA
VISHNU PRIYA
13.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 01.03.2018 passed by the Special Judge (Atrocities), Raipur, in an unregistered case titled Mukesh vs. Mr. C. Chandramauli and Others, whereby the application filed under Sections 199 and 200 of the CPC seeking cognizance and registration of a criminal case for offences punishable under Sections 408, 419, 420 and 34 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(q), 3(1)(u) and 4 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, was rejected, the Applicant has preferred the instant Criminal Revision.
2. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that he does not want to press this Revision.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the instant Revision is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Sudhir Kumar)
Judge Priya