Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5250/2026 of SMT. SUDHA AGRAWAL Vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 12 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44239 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5250 of 2026 Smt. Sudha Agrawal W/o Suresh Kumar Agrawal Aged About 60 Years R/o Dani-Para, Behind Of Police Station Kotwali, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of
CGHC010399342026
2026:CGHC:44239
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5250 of 2026
Smt. Sudha Agrawal W/o Suresh Kumar Agrawal Aged About 60 Years R/o Dani-Para, Behind Of Police Station Kotwali, Raigarh, Tahsil And
District Raigarh (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Revenue Disaster Management Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
2 - The Collector Raigarh (C.G.)
3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (R) Gharghoda, District Raigarh (C.G.)
4 - The Tahsildar Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.)
5 - The Revenue Inspector Tahsil Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.)
6 - The Patwari Halka No. 24, R.N.M. Dhourabhatha, Tahsil Tamnar,
7 - Ramesh Kumar Choudhari S/o. Santram Choudhari R/o. Village Pali, Gram Panchayat Jobro, Tahsil Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.)
8 - Prahlad Kanwar S/o Kunjram Kanwar R/o Village Jobro, Tahsil Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.)
9 - The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Jobro, Village Pali, Tahsil Tamnar,
District Raigarh (C.G.)
---Respondents
(Cause title taken from CIS System)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Rajkumar Pali, Advocate
For Respondents/State
: Mr. Anway Tiwari, PL
Digitally
signed
by AMIT
PATEL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 13.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records from the possession of the respondent authorities pertaining to the case of the petitioner for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and direct the respondents authority to comply the orders passed by the respondent no.4 in favour of the petitioner and take appropriate action against the respondent no. 7 & 8 under the provision of section 250(a) of the Land Revenue Code. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioners. An affidavit is filed herewith in support of this petition.”
2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file an appropriate application before the concerned authority.
3. The prayer is allowed.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge AMIT PATEL