Chhattisgarh High Court
SA/391/2017 of Smt. Chandan Bai Vs Lakshmi Narayan on 12 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44294 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No.391 of 2017 Smt. Chandan Bai W/o Shri Kedar Nath Brahman, Aged About 45 Years R/o Mauja Baalpur, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant (Plaintiff in the original suit) versus 1 - Lakshmi Narayan S/o
CGHC010033752017
2026:CGHC:44294
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SA No.391 of 2017
Smt. Chandan Bai W/o Shri Kedar Nath Brahman, Aged About 45 Years R/o Mauja Baalpur, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Appellant
(Plaintiff in the original suit)
versus
1 - Lakshmi Narayan S/o Dwarika Prasad Brahman, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Baalpur, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Nand Kumar S/o Dwarika Prasad Brahman, Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Baalpur, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No.
&
in
the
original
suit)
3.
State
Of
Chhattisgarh,
Through
Collector,
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh ................Defendant No.3 in the original suit
... Respondent(s)
For Appellant
:
None
For Respondent No.3/State :
Ms. K. Radhika, Panel lawyer
SB -
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant
Judgment On Board
13/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This second appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and decree dated 18.01.2017 passed by learned 3rd Additional District Judge, Baloda Bazar, District – Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara in Civil Appeal No.31-A/2014.
2. Even on the second call, none appeared on behalf of the appellant, nor was any representation made on his/her behalf. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the instant appeal for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. SD/-SD/-d/- (Sushma Sawant) Judge Satish