Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/7507/2026 of MANISH VISHWAKARMA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 12 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44205 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7507 of 2026 Manish Vishwakarma S/o Shivram Vishwakarma Aged About 35 Years Constable No. 2949, Police Department, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Present Address Gram - Biltara, Thana Chowki, Lakhanpur, District -
CGHC010395312026
2026:CGHC:44205
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 7507 of 2026
Manish Vishwakarma S/o Shivram Vishwakarma Aged About 35 Years Constable No. 2949, Police Department, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Present Address Gram - Biltara, Thana Chowki, Lakhanpur, District - Surajpur Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Director General Of Police, Chhattisgarh Police Headquarters, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Inspector General Of Police Raipur Range, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Superintendent Of Police District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Rahil Arun Kochar along with Ms. Swarnim P. Kochar, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. S.S. Badgaiya, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 13/10/2026
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been filed seeking a limited direction to Respondent No. 2, Director General of Police, to consider and decide the Petitioner's pending representations dated 24.09.2026 and 24.10.2024 (Annexures P-1 and P-2), whereby the Petitioner has sought a decision on his pending mercy petition concerning his removal from service.
2. Learned State counsel submits that, if the aforesaid representations are pending consideration before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided within a stipulated period, in accordance with law.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
4. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the Petitioner and the submission advanced by learned State counsel, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to Respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the Petitioner's representations dated 24.09.2026 and 24.10.2024 (Annexures P-1 and P-2), in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the Petitioner's claim.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru)
JUDGE Jyoti