Chhattisgarh High Court

CRMP/2662/2026 of JITU MAHANANDA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:44335 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2662 of 2026 1. Jitu Mahananda S/o Shri Darbari Mahananda Aged About 32 Years Permanent R/o Village Themra, Police Station Sinikala, District Balangir (Odisha) Presently R/o Medical Complex, Telipara, Bilaspur (C.G.)

CGHC010397282026

2026:CGHC:44335

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

CRMP No. 2662 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Jitu Mahananda S/o Shri Darbari Mahananda Aged About 32 Years Permanent R/o Village Themra, Police Station Sinikala, District Balangir (Odisha) Presently R/o Medical Complex, Telipara, Bilaspur (C.G.) (District Balangir Is Wrongly Mentioned As Balgir)

... Petitioner versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station City Kotwali, District Raigarh, C.G.

... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Himanshu Yadu, Panel Lawyer. SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 13/10/2026

1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that this petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 is filed by petitioner seeking a direction for conclusion of trial of Criminal Case No.1395/2021 (State vs Jitu Mahananda) pending before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class Raigarh within specified time period. SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI

2. On due consideration of facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and further considering that charges have been framed on 15.7.2025, as submitted by learned counsel for petitioner, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned trial Court to consider and decide Criminal Case No.1395/2021 (State vs Jitu Mahananda) in accordance with law expeditiously. The trial Court concerned shall take all necessary steps and measures for securing attendance of prosecution witnesses.

3. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/-

(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead