Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/1945/2026 of SHEIKH JAMEEL Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 12 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44290-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1945 of 2026 Sheikh Jameel S/o Late Shri Sheikh Nabi, Aged About 65 Years R/o Ram- sagarpara, District Dhamtari C.G. --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Commercial Tax (Excise)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CGHC010133692026
2026:CGHC:44290-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1945 of 2026 Sheikh Jameel S/o Late Shri Sheikh Nabi, Aged About 65 Years R/o Ram sagarpara, District Dhamtari C.G.
--- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Commercial Tax (Excise) Department, Matralaya, Atal Nagar Nawa, Raipur, District- Raipur C.G. 2 - Collector, Dhamtari Collectorate Dhamtari - District Dhamtari. C.G. 3 - District Excise Officer, Dhamtari Office Of The D.E.O. Dhamtari District Dhamtari C.G. 4 - Chhattisgarh Statet Marketing Society, Limited.. Through Manager, Office Of The Csmcl, Dhamtari District Dhamtari C.G. 5 - Joint Managing, Director, Csmcl. Raipur Distrcit Raipur C.G. 6 - Commissioner, Excise Department, Govt, Of Chhattisgarh, First Floor Sale Tax Bhawan (Gst), North Block Sector-19, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur C.G.
--- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Birthrey, Adv. For Respondents No. 1, 2 3 and 6 : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Add. Adv. General For respondents No. 4 and 5 : Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Adv. Hon’ble Mr. Krushna Ram Mohapatra, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Santosh Sharma, Judge Order on Board Per : Krushna Ram Mohapatra, Chief Justice 13-10-2026
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner, in this writ petition, prays for the following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction in the like nature including the writ in the nature of man damus thereby commanding the respondent authorities to decide the appeal (Annexure -P/23) dated 12.08.2025 and the objection dated 28.10.2025(Annexure -P/25) in accordance with law and pay the amount mentioned in the note sheet dated 06.10.2018/09.10.2018 (Annexure P/28) and (Annexure -P/29) dated 10.10.2018, in the in terest of justice. 10.2
pleased to issue Writ in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the order dated 14.10.2025 no. 6211 ( Annex ure P/24).
10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records of the case and grant any other relief deemed fit and appropriate in the case.”.
In course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition.
Learned counsel for the respondents do not have any objection to the above.
In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Santosh Sharma) (Krushna Ram Mohapatra) Judge Chief Justice Pathak