Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5192/2026 of RAMPRASAD Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 11 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43946 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5192 of 2026 1 - Ramprasad Son Of Haricharan Ghasiya Aged About 59 Years Resident Of Village- Girwani, P.S. And Tahsil Raghunathnagar, District - Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 2 - Basantlal Patvardhan Son Of Ramsundar
CGHC010381372026
2026:CGHC:43946
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5192 of 2026
1 - Ramprasad Son Of Haricharan Ghasiya Aged About 59 Years Resident Of Village- Girwani, P.S. And Tahsil Raghunathnagar, District - Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.)
2 - Basantlal Patvardhan Son Of Ramsundar Patvardhan Aged About 36
Years Resident Of Village Girwani Khadiyatola, P.S. And Tahsil - Raghunathnagar, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.)
3 - Heeralal Son Of Ramprasad, Aged About 40 Years Resident Of Village Pandri, P.S. And Tahsil Raghunathnagar, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj
(C.G.)
... Petitioners
Versus
1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Department Of Forest, Mantralaya, Mahanadi, Bhawan Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.).
2 - The Collector District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.).
3 - The Divisional Forest Officer Forest Division - Balrampur, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.)
4 - The Forest Range Officer, Raghunathnagar, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.)
... Respondents
(Cause title is downloaded from CIS Periphery.)
For Petitioners
:
Ms. Priya Kaiwart, Advocate.
For State
:
Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad.
Order on Board
12.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with a liberty to file afresh before the appropriate forum if any exigency arises.
2. Prayer is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge U.K. Raju