Chhattisgarh High Court
SA/526/2018 of NARAYAN KUMAR MISHRA Vs UMA MISHRA on 11 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44106 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 526 of 2018 Narayan Kumar Mishra, S/o late Premnarayan Mishra, aged about 52 years, R/o Village Sevara, Tahsil Pendra, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Plaintiff) ... Appellant versus 1. Uma Mishra, Wd/o late Ramji
CGHC010285702018
2026:CGHC:44106
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SA No. 526 of 2018
Narayan Kumar Mishra, S/o late Premnarayan Mishra, aged about 52 years, R/o Village Sevara, Tahsil Pendra, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
(Plaintiff)
... Appellant
versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Uma Mishra, Wd/o late Ramji Mishra, aged about 54 years, R/o Village Sevara, Tahsil Pendra, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Parsuram, S/o Mohan Kushwaha, aged about 62 years,
3. Mahendra Pratap Singh, S/o Mohan Kushwaha, aged about 54 years, Res. No.2 & 3 are R/o Rajnagar, Ward No.1, P.O. Rajnagar, Tahsil, Kotma, District Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh.
4. Arvind Kumar, S/o Mahendra Pratap Kushwaha, aged about 30 years, R/o Jheemar Colliery, Tahsil Kotma, District Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh.
5. State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents For Appellant : None present. For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nande, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant Order On Board 12/10/2026
1. This appeal is directed against judgment & decree dated 18-6-2018 passed by the Additional District Judge, Pendra Road, District
Bilaspur in Civil Appeal No.38A/2017, arising out of judgment & decree dated 21-4-2017 passed by the Civil Judge Class-II, Marwahi, District Bilaspur in Civil Suit No.93A/2014.
2. When the matter is called for hearing in two rounds, none present for the appellant to prosecute the appeal. No representation is made.
3. In absence of representation on behalf of the appellant, the Court has no option except to dismiss the appeal.
4. The second appeal is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sushma Sawant) Judge Soma