Chhattisgarh High Court
MAC/926/2024 of BRANCH MANAGER Vs SMT. CHIMO BAI on 11 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44013 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 926 of 2024 1 - Branch Manager Go Digit, General Insurance Company Limited, Near Sant Gyanehswar School, Vallabhnagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.),...(Non-Applicant No. 2 / Insurer) ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Smt.
CGHC010141512024
2026:CGHC:44013
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MAC No. 926 of 2024
1 - Branch Manager Go Digit, General Insurance Company Limited, Near Sant Gyanehswar School, Vallabhnagar, Raipur, District Raipur
(C.G.),...(Non-Applicant No. 2 / Insurer)
... Appellant(s)
versus
1 - Smt. Chimo Bai W/o Late Jageshwar Aged About 55 Years Caste - Uraon, Resident Of Jaimarga, Post Manora, Chowki Manora, District Jashpur (C.G.),...(Claimants)
2 - Leela Sharda Pradhan D/o Late Ramnandan Pradhan Aged About 20 Years Caste - Uraon, Resident Of Jaimarga, Post Manora, Chowki Manora, District Jashpur (C.G.)
3 - Chetna Pradhan D/o Late Ramnandan Pradhan Aged About 17
Years Minor, Through Natural Guardian Grandmother Smt. Chimo Bai, W/o Late Jageshwar, Aged About 55 Years, Caste - Uraon, Resident Of Jaimarga, Post Manora, Chowki Manora, District Jashpur (C.G.)
4 - Julfan Ansai S/o Shri Subhan Ansari Aged About 23 Years Resident Of Kudu, District Lohardaga (Jharkhand),..(Non-Applicant No. 1 / Owner And Driver Of Vehicle)
... Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s)
: None
For Respondent(s)
None
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Order On Board
12/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, has been preferred by the appellant Insurance Company challenging the impugned award dated 09.01.2024 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.), in Motor Accident Claim Case No.07/2023.
2. On the previous date of hearing i.e. 03.04.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant.
3. Today, when the matter was called for hearing, there was again no representation on behalf of the appellant.
4. Hence, in the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
5. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE
Khatai