Chhattisgarh High Court
MAC/862/2025 of SMT. GANESHIYA Vs SMT. SEETA PARAUHA on 11 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44022 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 862 of 2025 1 - Smt. Ganeshiya W/o Late Dheeran Aged About 34 Years R/o Darritola, P.S. Podi, District M.C.B. Chhattisgarh 2 - Khushaboo D/o Late Dheeran Aged About 16 Years Minor Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother
CGHC010144612025
2026:CGHC:44022
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MAC No. 862 of 2025
1 - Smt. Ganeshiya W/o Late Dheeran Aged About 34 Years R/o Darritola, P.S. Podi, District M.C.B. Chhattisgarh 2 - Khushaboo D/o Late Dheeran Aged About 16 Years Minor Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother Ganeshiya R/o Darritola, P.S. Podi, District M.C.B. Chhattisgarh 3 - Chandani D/o Late Dheeran Aged About 13 Years Minor Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother Ganeshiya R/o Darritola, P.S. Podi, District M.C.B. Chhattisgarh 4 - Sonu S/o Late Dheeran Aged About 11 Years Minor Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother Ganeshiya R/o Darritola, P.S. Podi, District M.C.B. Chhattisgarh 5 - Bhulan S/o Haricharan Aged About 60 Years R/o Darritola, P.S. Podi, District M.C.B. Chhattisgarh
... Appellants
versus
1 - Smt. Seeta Parauha W/o Ashok Parauha Aged About 50 Years R/o Dalganjan Dafai Chhota Bazar, Chirmiri, Tahsil Chirmiri, District M.C.B.
Chhattisgarh …..(Owner Of Offending Vehicle Mahindra Tractor Bearing Registration No.- C.G.-16/C.L.-6294)
2 - Branch Manager Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd.
Third Floor Gurukripa Tower, Beside I.C.I.C.I. Bank Vyapar Vihar
Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ….(Insurer Of Offending Vehicle Mahindra Tractor Bearing Registration No.- C.G.-16/C.L.-6294)
... Respondents
For Appellants
: Mr. Akhtar Hussain, Advocate.
For Respondent No.2
: Mr. Prashant Sahu, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order On Board 12/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short the "Act of 1988") has been preferred by the appellants/claimants challenging the order dated 14.02.2025, passed in Claim Case No.15/2024 by the 1st Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Manendragarh, District Koriya (C.G.), whereby the claim petition filed by the appellant/claimants under Section 164 of the Act, 1988, was dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file appropriate application before the appropriate forum.
3. Permission granted.
4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge pekde