Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/549/2026 of M/S RAIGARH PROJECTS LIMITED (FORMALLY MOHAN JUTE MILLS LIMITED) Vs EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION (ESIC) on 11 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44100 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 549 of 2026 M/s Raigarh Projects Limited (Formally Mohan Jute Mills Limited) Through Its Director Ankit Agrawal S/o Suresh Kumar Agrawal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Ward No. 4 Krishna Vihar Colony Raigarh, District Raigarh
CGHC010048302026
2026:CGHC:44100
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 549 of 2026
M/s Raigarh Projects Limited (Formally Mohan Jute Mills Limited)
Through Its Director Ankit Agrawal S/o Suresh Kumar Agrawal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Ward No. 4 Krishna Vihar Colony Raigarh, District Raigarh C.G., Registered Office 1 K Y D Street, 16 A, Palace Court, Kolkata Site Off. Kabir Chowk Raigarh C.G.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Employees State Insurance Corporation (Esic) (Ministry Of Labour And Employment, Government Of India), Through Regional Director Recovery Officer Regional Office, 107, Ram Nagar, Road, Kota, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 492010.
2 - Recovery Officer, Employees State Insurance Corporation (Esic), Through Recovery Officer Regional Office, 107, Ram Nagar, Road, Kota, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 492010.
3 - Sub Registrar (Land And Revenue), Raigarh, District Raigarh C.G.
4 - Tehsildar, Tehsil Raigarh, District Raigarh C.G.
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from CIS system)
Digitally
signed
by AMIT
PATEL
For Petitioner
: Mr. Satish Agrawal along with Mr. Manish Upadhyay, Advocates For State : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, PL
For Respondent Nos. 1
and 2
: Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Advocate
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 12.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has filed this petition with the following reliefs:- “ 10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ by quashing impugned recovery notice/recovery order dated 31.10.2025 (Annexure P/1) and impugned attachment order dated 27.01.2026 (Annexure P/1) against the petitioner.”
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide letter dated 16.09.2026, the respondent authorities have called upon the petitioner to appear for conciliation along with the relevant documents. He further submits that the concerned authorities may be directed to consider the documents submitted by the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.
3. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 has no objection to the aforesaid course of action.
4. Considering the aforesaid aspects, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any order on the merits of the case. The present order is being passed only in view of the fact that the respondent authorities have called upon the petitioner to appear for conciliation pursuant to the letter dated 16.09.2026. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to appear before the concerned authorities within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, along with the documents. The concerned authorities shall consider the documents submitted by the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of 45 days from the date of the petitioner's appearance. In the event that the petitioner has any grievance, he shall be at liberty to file an appropriate petition.
5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge AMIT PATEL