Chhattisgarh High Court
MAC/257/2024 of PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA Vs RAJESH KUMAR KESHRI on 11 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44005 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 257 of 2024 1 - Pankaj Kumar Gupta S/o Late Mohan Ram Gupta Aged About 31 Years R/o Darripara, P.S. And Tahsil Bhaiyathan, District Surgajpur, C.G., Presently Residing At Housing Board Colony, Gangapur, P.S. Gandhinagar,
CGHC010038832024
2026:CGHC:44005
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MAC No. 257 of 2024
1 - Pankaj Kumar Gupta S/o Late Mohan Ram Gupta Aged About 31
Years R/o Darripara, P.S. And Tahsil Bhaiyathan, District Surgajpur,
C.G., Presently Residing At Housing Board Colony, Gangapur, P.S.
Gandhinagar, Thasil Ambikapur, Dist.- Surguja, C.G.
2 - Sharda Devi Gupta W/o Late Mohan Ram Gupta Aged About 61
Years R/o Behind Ayurvedik Hospital, Girls Premises Road, Gangapur, P.S. Gandhinagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, Dist. Surguja, C.G.
… Appellant(s)
versus
1 - Rajesh Kumar Keshri S/o Bhagwan Prasad Keshri Aged About 45
Years R/o Unchdih, Post Basdei, P.S. And Tahsil Surajpur, District Surajpur, C.G. (Vehicle Owner)
2 - Somar Say S/o Jamuna Prasad Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Masira, Basdei, P.S. And Tahsil Surajpur, Dist. Surajpur, C.G. (Vehicle Driver)
3 - United India Insurance Company Limited Through- Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Office- Near Kumkum Hotel, Brahma Road Ambikapur, P.S. And Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja,
C.G. (Insurer)
... Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s)
: None
For Respondent No.3
Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Order On Board
12/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, has been preferred by the appellants/claimants challenging the impugned award dated 23.11.2023 passed by the Fifth Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.), in MACC No.252/2018, whereby the claim petition filed by the appellants/claimants has been dismissed.
2. On the previous date of hearing i.e.23.01.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants.
3. Today, when the matter was called for hearing, there was again no representation on behalf of the appellants, which shows that the appellants are no longer interested in pursuing the appeal.
4. Hence, in the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellants, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
5. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE
Khatai