Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/7336/2026 of JAGESHWARI YADAV Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 11 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43959 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7336 of 2026 Jageshwari Yadav W/o Bhuneshwar Yadav Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Jarga, Gram Panchayat Konghara, Development Block Kota, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh
CGHC010384462026
2026:CGHC:43959
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 7336 of 2026
Jageshwari Yadav W/o Bhuneshwar Yadav Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Jarga, Gram Panchayat Konghara, Development Block Kota, District - Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Woman And Child Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
3 - Collector District Bilaspur (C.G.)
4 - Additional Collector District Bilaspur (C.G.)
5 - District Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
6 - Project Officer Integrated Child Development Project Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
7 - Chief Executive Officer District Panchayat Kota, District Bilaspur
(C.G.)
8 - Saraswati Yadav W/o Balram Yadav R/o Village Jarga, Gram Panchayat Konchra, Development Block Kota, Dsitrict Bilaspur (C.G.)
9 - Jaleshwari Yadav W/o Pardeshi Ram Yadav R/o Village Jarga, Gram Panchayat Konghara Development Block Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from CIS)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Shri Achyut Tiwari, Advocate
For State
:
Shri Vivek Verma, Govt. Advocate
For Respondent no. 9:
Shri Navneet Kumar Yadav along with
Shri Priyanshu Yadav, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri
Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Order on Board
12.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State and respondent No. 9 have raised an objection regarding the maintainability of the present writ petition, which has been filed challenging the order dated 21.09.2026 passed by the Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, whereby the appeal preferred by respondent No. 9 has been allowed. They submit that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of approaching the Director, Panchayat, and, in support of their submission, have placed reliance upon the order dated 21.07.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 4422 of 2018.
2. In view of the aforesaid objection, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the competent authority, namely, the Director, Panchayat, for redressal of the petitioner's grievance.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge
Shoaib