Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRC/6509/2026 of SMT. BHUNESHWARI VISHWAKARMA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 11 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44032 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 6509 of 2026 * - Smt. Bhuneshwari Vishwakarma W/o Dilip Vishwakarma Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 15, Indira Awas Dongargaon, Police Station Dongargaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Applicant Versus * - State Of
CGHC010277762026
2026:CGHC:44032
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 6509 of 2026
* - Smt. Bhuneshwari Vishwakarma W/o Dilip Vishwakarma Aged About 40
Years R/o Ward No. 15, Indira Awas Dongargaon, Police Station Dongargaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
... Applicant
Versus
* - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Station House Officer, Police Station- Dongargaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
... Non-Applicant
For Applicant
:
Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate
For Non-Applicant
:
Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava,
Government Advocate.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 12/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The applicant has preferred this first bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 as she is in jail since 02.12.2024 in connection with Crime No. 281/2024 registered at Police Station Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.), for commission of offence punishable under Sections 103(1) of BNS.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this bail application. However, he would submit that the applicant is in jail since 02.12.2024, therefore, the learned trial Court may be directed to conclude the trial at the earliest.
3. No objection from other side.
4. Permission granted.
5. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the trial Court is directed to make all endevours to conclude the trial pending against the present applicant within a period of 08 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
6. If the trial is not concluded within said period, the applicant would be at liberty to revive her prayer. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti