Chhattisgarh High Court
WA/937/2026 of KARUNASAGAR PATEL Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 11 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43963-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 937 of 2026 Karunasagar Patel S/o Late Shri Parmanand Patel Aged About 33 Years Currently Posted As Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Kuakonda District Dantewada (Attached To Zila Panchayat And Awaiting
CGHC010349002026
2026:CGHC:43963-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WA No. 937 of 2026
Karunasagar Patel S/o Late Shri Parmanand Patel Aged About 33 Years Currently Posted As Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Kuakonda District Dantewada (Attached To Zila Panchayat And Awaiting Independent Charge At Kuakonda)
... Appellant
versus
1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Department of Scheduled Tribes And Scheduled Castes Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.)
2 - The Collector, Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada, (C.G.)
3 - The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.)
4 - Tarun Kumar Deshmukh Deputy Director Panchayat, District South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.)
... Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Appellant
: Ms. Astha Shukla, Advocate
For State
: Ms. Anuja Sharma, Deputy Government
Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Krushna Ram Mohapatra, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Santosh Sharma, Judge Judgment on Board Per Krushna Ram Mohapatra , Chief Justice
12.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Ms. Astha Shukla, learned counsel for the Appellant as well as Ms. Anuja Sharma, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State.
2. The Appellant, in this intra-Court appeal, seeks to assail the order dated 13.07.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (S) No. 5054 of 2026 (Annexure A/1), wherein the Writ Petition was dismissed.
3. Ms. Shukla, learned counsel for the Appellant, submits that after filing of the Writ Appeal, the Appellant has already been handed over the charge of Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kuakonda, District South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.). Hence, the Writ Appeal has become academic, and as such, she prays for withdrawal of the Writ Appeal.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn, being infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Santosh Sharma) (Krushna Ram Mohapatra) Judge Chief Justice Anu