Chhattisgarh High Court

WPS/6677/2026 of MAYA ANCHAL LAHRE Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 11 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:44044 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6677 of 2026 Maya Anchal Lahre W/o Umashankar Lahre Aged About 34 Years Posted As Tahsildar, Kanker District Kanker Chhattisgarh, R/o A -2, Nature City, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1

CGHC010352862026

2026:CGHC:44044

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPS No. 6677 of 2026

Maya Anchal Lahre W/o Umashankar Lahre Aged About 34 Years Posted As Tahsildar, Kanker District Kanker Chhattisgarh, R/o A-2, Nature City, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Under Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Board Of Revenue Through Its Secretary, Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Commissioner (Revenue) Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector, Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

6 - Collector, Kanker District Kanker Chhattisgarh 7 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

... Respondent(s)

(Cause title taken from CIS)

For Petitioner(s)

: Ms. Zainab Mustafa Vanak, Advocate

For Respondent(s)

: Ms. Apurva Nigam, Panel Lawyer

Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

Order on Board

12.10.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard on I.A. No. 02 of 2026, an application seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.

2. A perusal of the said application reveals that the petitioner does not wish to press the present writ petition and seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the same with liberty to file a fresh if occasion arises.

3. Accordingly, I.A. No. 02 of 2026 is allowed. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/-

(Bibhu Datta Guru)

JUDGE Shoaib

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead