Chhattisgarh High Court
CRR/948/2022 of PRANAY TRIPATHI Vs SMT. ANKITA TRIPATHI on 11 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44046 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 948 of 2022 1. Pranay Tripathi, S/o Shri Parikshit Tripathi, aged about 35 Years, 2. Parikshit Tripathi, S/o Late Menha Ram Tripathi, aged about 62 Years, 3. Smt. Shruti Tripathi, W/o Parikshit Tripathi, aged about 58
CGHC010284852022
2026:CGHC:44046
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRR No. 948 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Pranay Tripathi, S/o Shri Parikshit Tripathi, aged about 35 Years,
2. Parikshit Tripathi, S/o Late Menha Ram Tripathi, aged about 62 Years,
3. Smt. Shruti Tripathi, W/o Parikshit Tripathi, aged about 58 Years,
4. Praveen Tripathi, S/o Parikshit Tripathi, aged about 32 Years,
5. Smt. Smriti Mahapatre, W/o Praveen Mahapatre, aged about 30 Years,
6. Praveen Kumar Mahapatre, S/o Vishnucharan Mahapatre, aged about 36 Years, All are R/o Village- Malidipa, Near Gayatri Mandir, Boirdadar, Raigarh, Tahsil and District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
...Applicants versus • Smt. Ankita Tripathi, W/o Pranay Tripathi, aged about 29 Years, Occupation- House Wife, R/o Sindhi Colony, Chakradharnagar, Raigarh, Tahsil and District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
...Non-applicant For Applicants : Ms. Upasana Yadav, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Jitendra Gupta, Advocate. For Non-applicant : Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 12/10/2026
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the Original MJC (Criminal) Case No. 236/2017 (Smt. Ankita Tripathi vs. Pranay Tripathi and Ors.) has been decided on 02.08.2025 by the
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raigarh, C.G. Therefore, this petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of above, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
Judge Akhilesh