Chhattisgarh High Court

WP227/120/2026 of INDRAJEET SINGH Vs PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH on 11 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:44132 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 120 of 2026 1 - Indrajeet Singh S/o Satyadev Singh Aged About 58 Years Caste Bhuihar, R/o Village And Tehsil Mohla, Distt. Mohla Manpur Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Pankaj Kumar Singh S/o

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CGHC010034982026

2026:CGHC:44132

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 120 of 2026 1 - Indrajeet Singh S/o Satyadev Singh Aged About 58 Years Caste Bhuihar, R/o Village And Tehsil Mohla, Distt. Mohla Manpur Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh.

... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Pankaj Kumar Singh S/o Late Rameshwar Singh Aged About 39 Years R/o House No. 118, Ward No. 04, Village And Tehsil Mohla, Distt. Mohla Manpur Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Praveen S/o Late Rameshwar Singh Aged About 36 Years R/o House No. 118, Ward No. 4, Village And Tehsil Mohla, Distt. Mohla Manpur Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Priyesh Kumar Singh S/o Late Rameshwar Singh Aged About 33 Years R/o House No. 118, Ward No. 4, Village And Tehsil Mohla, Distt. Mohla Manpur Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Smt. Nirmala Devi W/o Late Rameshwar Singh Aged About 61 Years R/o House No. 118, Ward No. 4, Village And Tehsil Mohla, Distt. Mohla Manpur Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh.

5 - Smt. Sunita Bai @ Sujata W/o Late Pashupati Singh Aged About 55 Years Caste Bhuihar, R/o Village Gopalnagar, Tahsil And Distt. Ballia, U.P. 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate, Distt. Mohla Manpur Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh.

... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None present. For Respondent/State : Ms.Isha Jajodia, PL

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Order on Board 12/10/2026 It transpires from the order sheets that on 24.09.2026, when the matter was taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the case was adjourned. Today also when the matter was taken up for hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the above, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead