Chhattisgarh High Court
REVP/295/2026 of INDRAJEET SINGH Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 11 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43950 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 295 of 2026 1 - Indrajeet Singh S/o Late Shri Kartar Singh Aged About 63 Years (Age Of Petitioner Wrongly Mentioned In The Impugned Order As 61), R/o Quater No 1/ A , Street No 7, Sector 2, Bhilai, District- Durg,
CGHC010349652026
2026:CGHC:43950
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
REVP No. 295 of 2026
1 - Indrajeet Singh S/o Late Shri Kartar Singh Aged About 63 Years (Age Of Petitioner Wrongly Mentioned In The Impugned Order As 61), R/o Quater No 1/ A, Street No 7, Sector 2, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
Versus
1 – State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Commissioner Municipal Corporation Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Durg, District- Durg Chhattisgarh 4 - Estate Officer Municipal Corporation Bhilai, District- Durg Chhattisgarh 5 - Senior Superintendent Of Police Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh 6 - Dipesh Kumar Nathwani S/o Mansukh Lal Nathwani Aged About 54 Years R/o Plot No 11, Ward No 10, Shiv Mandir Colony, Shanti Nagar, Supela, Bhilai, District- Durg Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
(Cause title is downloaded from CIS Periphery.)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Shailendra Kumar Bajpai, Advocate.
For State
: Mr. Anil Pandey, G.A.
For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Gourang Dubey, Counsel on behalf of Mr.
Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad.
Order on Board
12.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with a liberty to file afresh before the appropriate forum if any exigency arises.
2. Prayer is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge U.K. Raju