Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/7425/2026 of SMT. VIMLA SIDAR, Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 8 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43924 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7425 of 2026 Smt. Vimla Sidar, Wife Late Amar Say Aged About 60 Years (Legal Heirs Of Amar Say Akushal Sharmik) At Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Raigarh Division, District Raigarh (C.G.), R/o Ward No. 4,
CGHC010396992026
2026:CGHC:43924
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 7425 of 2026
Smt. Vimla Sidar, Wife Late Amar Say Aged About 60 Years (Legal Heirs Of Amar Say Akushal Sharmik) At Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Raigarh Division, District Raigarh (C.G.), R/o Ward No. 4, Banjari Para Lailunga, District Raigarh, (C.G.)
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through -The Secretary, Department Of Public Works, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.)
2 - Engineer In Chief, Department Of Public Works, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Naya Raipur, (C.G.)
3 - Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur District Bilaspur
(C.G.)
4 - Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur Circle, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
5 - Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Raigarh Division, District Raigarh (C.G.)
6 - Joint Director, Treasury, Account & Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (C.G.)
... Respondents
(Cause title is taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate
For Respondents/ State
: Ms. Apurva Nigam, Panel Lawyer
(Hon’ble Shri Justice
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
)
Order on Board
09/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking for issuance of an appropriate direction to the Respondent authorities for considering the claim of the Petitioner for grant of leave encashment in terms of the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Work- Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977.
2. According to the Petitioner, she has made her claim in the light of the recent decision passed by this Court rendered in W.P.(S) No.3870/2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 30.9.2022, wherein similar claim of the Petitioner therein has been allowed. The said decision also stands affirmed by the Division Bench in W.A. No.119/2023, decided on 20.6.2023.
3. Given the said facts, the present Writ Petition is disposed of at this juncture, directing the Respondent Authorities to immediately process the claim of similarly placed person herein in the light of the aforesaid decision passed by this Court on the same subject- matter, within an outer limit of 120 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)
JUDGE Amardeep/ $. Bhilwar