Chhattisgarh High Court
FA/105/2021 of MUNESH GUPTA Vs SMT. JYOTI GUPTA on 8 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43880 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 105 of 2021 Munesh Gupta S/o Late Banshidhar Gupta Aged About 36 Years Occupation- Private Business/ Agriculture, R/o Mohall Deviganj Road, Nagar- Ambikapur, Thana And Tehsil Ambikapur District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) Haal
1
CGHC010281402021
2026:CGHC:43880
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA No. 105 of 2021
Munesh Gupta S/o Late Banshidhar Gupta Aged About 36 Years Occupation- Private Business/ Agriculture, R/o Mohall Deviganj Road, Nagar- Ambikapur, Thana And Tehsil Ambikapur District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) Haal Mukaam Village Chathiramaa, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh
... Appellant
versus
1 - Smt. Jyoti Gupta W/o Late Rajeev Gupta, Aged About 30 Years R/o Mohalla Maharaja Gali, Deviganj Road Nagar Ambikapur, Thana And Tehsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh), District :
Surguja
(Ambikapur),
Chhattisgarh
2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Sarguja Ambikapur, District Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh), District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Appellant
:
Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate
For Respondent No. 1
:
Mr. Rahul Mishra, Advocate
For Respondent No. 2
:
Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order On Board 09.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the dispute between the appellant/defendant No. 1 and respondent No. 1/plaintiff has been amicably settled. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the appellant/defendant No. 1 does not wish to prosecute the present appeal.
2. In view of above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.
Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput)
Judge