Chhattisgarh High Court
CRMP/2637/2026 of KRISHNAKANT SHARMA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 8 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43791-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2637 of 2026 1. Krishnakant Sharma S/o Rakesh Sharma Aged About 29 Years R/o 5 - A , Talwandi, Jhalawar Road, Keshopura, Kota, Dist. Kota Rajasthan. 2. Nilima Sharma W/o Rakesh Sharma Aged About 59 Years R/o 5 - A ,
CGHC010394602026
2026:CGHC:43791-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRMP No. 2637 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Krishnakant Sharma S/o Rakesh Sharma Aged About 29 Years R/o 5 - A, Talwandi, Jhalawar Road, Keshopura, Kota, Dist. Kota Rajasthan.
2. Nilima Sharma W/o Rakesh Sharma Aged About 59 Years R/o 5 - A, Talwandi, Jhalawar Road, Keshopura, Kota, Dist. Kota Rajasthan.
3. Rakesh Sharma S/o Harbansh Lal Sharma Aged About 61 Years R/o 5 - A, Talwandi, Jhalawar Road, Keshopura, Kota, Dist. Kota Rajasthan.
4. Nikita Sharma D/o Rakesh Sharma Aged About 33 Years R/o 5 - A, Talwandi, Jhalawar Road, Keshopura, Kota, Dist. Kota Rajasthan.
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, P. S. - Mahila Thana, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.
2. Smt. Vanshika Pandey W/o Krishnalant Sharma Aged About 26 Years R/o Dubey Colony, Mowa P. S. Pandri, Raipur, Dist. Raipur, C.G. (Complainant)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Advocate For State : Ms. Palak Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer D.B.:-
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas &
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sudhir Kumar Order on Board 09.10.2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present criminal misc. petition with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the subsequent charge-sheet.
2. Prayer is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the present criminal misc. petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioners. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Sd/- (Sudhir Kumar) Judge Manish