Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3436/2021 of VINOD SAHU Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 8 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43834 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3436 of 2021 Vinod Sahu S/o Chait Ram Sahu, Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Dadhipara, Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Post Daukapa, Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of
CGHC010209352021
2026:CGHC:43834
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3436 of 2021
Vinod Sahu S/o Chait Ram Sahu, Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Dadhipara, Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Post Daukapa, Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 3 - Returning Officer, Panchayat Election, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 4 - Presiding Officers, (Panchayat Election Booth No. 362), Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 5 - Presiding Officers, (Panchayat Election Booth no. 363), Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 6 - Presiding Officers, (Panchayat Election Booth No. 364), Gram Panchayat- Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh
7 - Vijay Khandekar S/o Bandhilal Khandekar Aged About 45 Years R/o Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 8 - Jitendra Kumar Sahu S/o Bholaram Sahu Aged About 28 Years R/o Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 9 - Nandu Mangeshkar S/o Udal Mangeshkar, Aged About 45 Years R/o Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 10 - Seth Kumar S/o Shankar Aged About 40 Years R/o Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
(Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Raveena, Advocate
For Respondent(s)
:
Dr. Arham Siddique, Panel Lawyer
SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 09/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shyna Ajay