Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5178/2026 of GOVIND YADAV Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 8 October 2026
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5178 of 2026 Govind Yadav Son Of Kunwar Ram Yadav, Aged About 45 Years Resident Of Village - Jurudand, Police Station And Tahsil - Bagicha, District - Jashpur C.G. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The
CGHC010384592026
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5178 of 2026
Govind Yadav Son Of Kunwar Ram Yadav, Aged About 45 Years Resident Of Village - Jurudand, Police Station And Tahsil - Bagicha, District - Jashpur C.G.
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur, C.G.
-
The
Tehsildar,
Bagicha,
District
-
Jashpur
C.G.
3 - Gangaram Son Of Kurso Ram, Resident Of Village - Jurudand, Police Station
And
Tahsil
-
Bagicha,
District
Jashpur
C.G.
4 - Karuna Ram Son Of Antoram, Resident Of Village - Jurudand, Police Station
And
Tahsil
-
Bagicha,
District
Jashpur
C.G.
5 - Mohan Ram Son Of Late Bodal Ram, Resident Of Village - Jurudand, Police Station
And
Tahsil
-
Bagicha,
District
Jashpur
C.G.
6 - Shrawan Kumar Son Of Girdhari Ram, Resident Of Village - Jurudand, Police Station
And
Tahsil
-
Bagicha,
District
Jashpur
C.G.
7 - Fakir Ram Son Of Niranjan Ram, Resident Of Village - Jurudand, Police Station
And
Tahsil
-
Bagicha,
District
Jashpur
C.G.
8 - Maheshwar Ram Son Of Bhakti Ram, Resident Of Village - Jurudand, Police Station
And
Tahsil
-
Bagicha,
District
Jashpur
C.G.
9 - Visheshwar Ram Son Of Karuna Ram, Resident Of Village - Jurudand, Police Station
And
Tahsil
-
Bagicha,
District
Jashpur
C.G.
10 - Suresh Ram Son Of Mohan Ram, Resident Of Village - Jurudand, Police Station
And
Tahsil
-
Bagicha,
District
Jashpur
C.G.
11 - Bajrang Ram Son Of Late Vishkeshan Ram, Resident Of Village - Jurudand, Police Station And Tahsil - Bagicha, District Jashpur C.G.
12 - Laxmi Ram Son Of Mayadhoro Ram, Resident Of Village - Jurudand, Police
Station
And
Tahsil
-
Bagicha,
District
Jashpur
C.G.
13 - Kuldeep Gupta, Patwari, P. H. No. 26, Tahsil - Bagicha, District - Jashpur
C.G.
14 - Satish Kumar Das, Patwari, P. H. No. 22, Tahsil - Bagicha, District - Jashpur
C.G.
15 - Vikas Kumar Gupta, Patwari, P. H. No. 25, Tahsil - Bagicha, District - Jashpur
C.G.
16 - Manoj Kumar Son Of Gangaram, R/o Bagicha, District - Jashpur C.G.
17 - Rajesh Kumar Son Of Govind Ram, R/o Bagicha, District - Jashpur C.G.
18 - Bandhu Ram Son Of Madan Ram, R/o Bagicha, District - Jashpur C.G.
19 - Keshav Son Of Damrudhar, R/o Bagicha, District - Jashpur C.G.
20 - Fakir Ram Son Of Niranjan Ram, R/o Bagicha, District - Jashpur C.G.
21 - Mukta Yadav Wife Of Maheshwar Ram, R/o Village - Bhitghara (Amatoli), Tahsil - Bagicha, District - Jashpur
C.G.
22 - Sonu Gupta Son Of Keshav Gupta, Resident Of Tahsil Chowk, Bagicha, District - Jashpur
C.G.
23 - The Collector, Jashpur, District - Jashpur C.G.
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioners
: Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Advocate
For State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 09.10
.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is challenging the order dated 06.08.2026 passed by the Tahsildar, whereby an order of eviction has been passed despite the pendency of a civil suit for declaration of title filed against the State.
2. Learned counsel for the State raises an objection regarding the maintainability of the present petition on the ground that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an appeal before the concerned SDO. Accordingly, it is contended that the petitioner ought to have availed himself of the said remedy.
3. Having considered the aforesaid aspects of the matter, and since an efficacious alternative remedy is available to the petitioner under the law by way of an appeal before the concerned SDO, the petitioner is relegated to avail himself of the said remedy, if so wishes.
4. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Saurabh