Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3906/2021 of SMT. PHOOLESHWARI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 8 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43896 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3906 of 2021 1 - Smt. Phooleshwari W/o Shri Nohar Sahu Aged About 35 Years President Of Gram Harmo Ma Laxmi Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Village Harmo, Gram Panchayat Katgo, Block And Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham
CGHC010239452021
2026:CGHC:43896
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3906 of 2021
1 - Smt. Phooleshwari W/o Shri Nohar Sahu Aged About 35 Years President Of Gram Harmo Ma Laxmi Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Village Harmo, Gram Panchayat Katgo, Block And Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Co- Operative, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Kabirdham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh., District :
Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 4 - Food Inspector Bodla Block And Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner(s)
: None
For Respondent/State
: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A.
SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 09/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- RUCHI YADAV Digitally signed by RUCHI YADAV
“(i) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, therein direct to the respondents to submit entire concerned records before this Hon'ble court for its kind perusal.
(ii) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari by which set-a-side the impugned order dated 15.03.2021 (Annexure P-1).
(iii) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari direct therein to the respondent no. 3 to hand over charge of fair price shop, Katgo to the petitioner immediately.
(iv) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.”
2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called for hearing. Learned State counsel is present.
3. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 15.03.2021 and has also sought a direction to respondent No.3 to hand over the charge of Fair Price Shop, Katgo, to the petitioner. However, no interim order has been passed in favour of the petitioner.
4. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and considering the present status of the reliefs sought in the petition, no effective relief survives for consideration in the present writ petition.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi