Chhattisgarh High Court

MCRCA/1680/2026 of DILIP KUMAR RAY Vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:43871 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1680 of 2026 1 - Dilip Kumar Ray S/o Late Batkrushna Sethi Aged About 39 Years R/o Arbana Tower -01, Flat No. 2502, -783, Anandpur Madurdaha, E. K. T. District Kolkata (West Bengal). --- Applicant versus 1 - The State

CGHC010394382026

2026:CGHC:43871

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

MCRCA No. 1680 of 2026

1 - Dilip Kumar Ray S/o Late Batkrushna Sethi Aged About 39 Years R/o Arbana Tower -01, Flat No. 2502, -783, Anandpur Madurdaha, E. K. T.

District Kolkata (West Bengal).

--- Applicant

versus

1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station Khairagarh District Khairagarh, Chhuikhadan Gandai Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondent

(Cause title is taken from CIS system)

For Applicant

: Mr. D.K. Gwalre, Advocate

For Respondent/State

: Ms. Sunita Manikpuri, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice

Parth Prateem Sahu

Order On Board

09/10/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No. 194 of 2026 registered at Police Station Khairagarh, District – Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan-Gandai (C.G.) under Sections 34 (1) (a), 34 (2), 36, 49-A (b) (c), 59 (A) (i) (ii) of the BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN

Chhattisgarh Excise Act, Section 61 (2), 318 (4), 336 (2), 336 (3), 340

(2) and 338 of BNS.

2. Learned State counsel raised an objection with regard to maintainability of this bail application on the ground that applicant was earlier arrested and thereafter produced before the Court of ACJM, Alipore (W.B). The Court at Alipore has released the applicant on interim bail with a direction to applicant to appear before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khairagarh on or before 15.06.2026 and to submit compliance report. It also appears that applicant failed to comply with the direction issue by ACJM, Alipore and this application is filed against issuance of arrest warrant. The applicant is having remedy to file appropriate application for cancellation of arrest warrant.

3. At this stage, learned counsel for applicant submits that in view of the objection raised by learned State counsel, he will file appropriate application seeking cancellation of arrest warrant.

4. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for parties, this application for grant of anticipatory bail is disposed of with liberty to applicant to file appropriate application seeking cancellation of bail, before the concerned Court. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead