Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3836/2021 of M/S VIKAS KUMAR JAISWAL Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 8 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43895 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3836 of 2021 1 - M/s Vikas Kumar Jaiswal Through Its Proprietor, Vikas Jaiswal, S/o Shri Rajkumar Jaiswal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Main Road Bagicha, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of
CGHC010244602021
2026:CGHC:43895
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3836 of 2021
1 - M/s Vikas Kumar Jaiswal Through Its Proprietor, Vikas Jaiswal, S/o Shri Rajkumar Jaiswal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Main Road Bagicha, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Gundardehi, District Balod Chhattisgarh, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Ekansh Diwakar appears on behalf of Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, P.L.
For Respondent No.2
: Mr. Alok Bakshi on behalf of Ms. Laxmin Tondey Advocate SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board RUCHI
YADAV
Digitally
signed by
RUCHI
YADAV
09/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to further direct to respondent authorities to settle the final bill of the petitioner. 10.2 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner together with cost of the petition.”
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the amount due to the petitioner has already been paid. He, therefore, submits that the present petition has rendered infructuous.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not dispute the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing further survives for adjudication in the present writ petition.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi