Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3336/2021 of Jogendra Shah Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 8 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43820 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3336 of 2021 1 - Jogendra Shah S/o Ram Chij Shah Aged About 61 Years R/o Raut Para, Bijapur, Tahsil Bijapur District Bijapur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chief Secretary Department
CGHC010196272021
2026:CGHC:43820
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3336 of 2021
1 - Jogendra Shah S/o Ram Chij Shah Aged About 61 Years R/o Raut Para, Bijapur, Tahsil Bijapur District Bijapur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chief Secretary Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Bijapur District Bijapur Chhattisgarh 3 - Tahsildar Bijapur District Bijapur Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Municipal Officer Municipal Corporation Bijapur District Bijapur Chhattisgarh 5 - Sub Divisional Officer Bijapur District Bijapur Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Ashok Patil, Advocate
For State
:
Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, GA
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
09/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner, in this Writ Petition, has prayed for the following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ, direction or order to the respondent no.2 as to why the final order is not being passed despite the final approval report is submitted by the respondent no. 3 and 5 which are filed as annexure P/1 and P/9. 10.2 That the Respondent No.4 may be directed to take appropriate stapes about payment of the compensation to the petitioner when residential building was demolished. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper according to the facts and circumstances of the case along-with the cost of the petitioner.”
2. At the outset, learned State counsel, referring to paragraph 11 of the return, submits that the land in exchange has already been given to the petitioner with his consent and the concerned Collector, Bijapur, has passed the order dated 14.02.2022 in this regard. The said paragraph reads as under:- “11.It is respectfully submitted that after receipt of the aforesaid proposal/report from the SDO, Revenue, Bijapur, the consent for allotment of the aforesaid proposed land in exchange was obtained from the petitioner and the petitioner himself gave his consent in this regard and based upon the consent accorded by the petitioner, the Collector, Bijaspur, after following due process of law, accorded its permission for allotment of the land admeasuring 0.0132 hectare of khasra no. 787/2 total area 2.0021 hectare on exchange to the petitioner and in this regard, a detailed order was passed on 14/02/2022. Τo demonstrate this fact, copy of the order dated 14/02/2022 passed by the Collector, Bijapur is being filed herewith as Annexure R/3.”
3. Having considered the submissions made by learned State counsel and the averments made in paragraph 11 of the return, particularly the fact that the land in exchange has already been given to the petitioner with his consent and the order dated 14.02.2022 has already been passed by the concerned Collector, Bijapur, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present matter.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Priyanka