Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5069/2026 of SMT. SHARDA POYAM Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 8 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43792 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5069 of 2026 Smt. Sharda Poyam W/o Late Rajuram Poyam Aged About 55 Years R/o Dongipara, Tehsil Kondagaon, Distt. Kondagaon Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry
CGHC010381392026
2026:CGHC:43792
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5069 of 2026
Smt. Sharda Poyam W/o Late Rajuram Poyam Aged About 55 Years R/o Dongipara, Tehsil Kondagaon, Distt. Kondagaon Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Revenue Department, New Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary/ Upper Secretary Of Home Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Distt.
Raipur Chhattisgarh
3 - Director General Of Police Of State Of Chhattisgarh, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Central Reserve Police Forces (C R P F) Chhattisgarh Head Quarter, Near P H Q, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Cobra Tech Wing Of Central Reserve Police Force (C R P F), Jagdalpur, Bastar Chhattisgarh 6 - The Collector, Land Acquisition Bastar Chhattisgarh 7 - Director/ Joint Director Town And Country Planning, Distt. Bastar Chhattisgarh
---Respondents
(Cause title taken from CIS System)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Raza Ali, Advocate
For Respondents/State
: Mr. Priyank Rathi, GA
For Union of India
: Ms. Anmol Sharma, CGC
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board Digitally signed by AMIT
PATEL
09.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant writ petition with liberty to file a duly constituted fresh petition along with legible documents.
2. The prayer is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge AMIT PATEL