Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/7399/2026 of DEVSHARAN PAIKRA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 8 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43916 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7399 of 2026 Devsharan Paikra S/o Kanchan Singh Paikra, Aged About 42 Years Presently Posted As Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, At Office Of Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Katghora, District Korba
CGHC010400272026
2026:CGHC:43916
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 7399 of 2026
Devsharan Paikra S/o Kanchan Singh Paikra, Aged About 42 Years Presently Posted As Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, At Office Of Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Agriculture Development And Farmer Velfare And Bio. Technology Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2 - Director Directorate Of Agriculture Development And Farmer Welfare And Bio- Technology Department Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3 - Divisional Joint Director Agriculture Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
4 - Deputy Director Agriculture District Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s)
(Cause title is taken from the CIS)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :
Ms Zainab Mustafa Vanak, Advocate
For Respondent/State
:
Shri Suyash Dhar Badgayya, GA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 09.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate alternative remedy available under the law.
2. Not opposed by the learned State counsel.
Wps 7399 of 2026 2
3. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
4. In such eventuality, the appellate authority is directed to decide the appeal expeditiously. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma