Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRCA/1631/2026 of PRAKASH CHANDRA SINHA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 8 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43876 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1631 of 2026 Prakash Chandra Sinha S/o Mukund Ram Sinha Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Dhowakot P. O. Urmal Block Deobhog P S Deobhog Dist. Gariaband C. G. Pin 493890 .. Applicant (s) versus 1 - State Of
CGHC010374982026
2026:CGHC:43876
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 1631 of 2026
Prakash Chandra Sinha S/o Mukund Ram Sinha Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Dhowakot P. O. Urmal Block Deobhog P S Deobhog Dist. Gariaband
C. G. Pin 493890
.. Applicant (s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Police Station Deobhog District Gariaband C. G.
2 - Laxmikanta Sinha S/o Himanlal Sinha Aged About 33 Years Village Dhourakot P O Urnaz Block Deobhog P S Deobhog Distt. Gariaband C. G.
Pin 493890
... Respondent(s)
For Applicant
:
Mr. Ajaya Kumar Barik, Advocate
For State
:
Mr. Sumit Singh, Dy. Advocate General
with Mr. Varunendra Mishra, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order On Board 09/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the State submits that in view of objection raised by the Registry, he has sought instructions from the concerned Police Station and according to his information gathered from Station House Officer, complainant has submitted an application that he does not want any action on his complaint. He further submits that after receipt of application, FIR is not registered till date. He further submits that according to his instructions, in view of application submitted by complainant on 13.08.2026, police will not take any action on the complaint submitted by the complainant, now.
2. In the aforementioned facts of the case, in the opinion of this Court, there is no apprehension of arrest of applicant.
3. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of.
Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu)
Judge Praveen