Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/340/2018 of SMT. PUNIMATI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 8 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43809 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 340 of 2018 1 - Smt. Punimati W/o Late Shri Ujjawal Das, Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Basanpali, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Jamuna Bai D/o Late Shri Ujjawal
CGHC010039482018
2026:CGHC:43809
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 340 of 2018
1 - Smt. Punimati W/o Late Shri Ujjawal Das, Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Basanpali, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District :
Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
2 - Jamuna Bai D/o Late Shri Ujjawal Das Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Basanpali, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District :
Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
3 - Rohini Das D/o Late Shri Ujjawal Das, Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Basanpali, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District :
Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mntralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kharsia, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioners
: Mr. Jeet Patel, Advocate.
For respondents/State
: Mr. K.S. Saini, Dy. Govt. Advocate.
KUNAL
DEWANGAN
Digitally
signed by
KUNAL
DEWANGAN
Hon'ble Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey, Judge
Order on Board
09.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed and therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Having considered the submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge Kunal