Chhattisgarh High Court

WPC/32/2017 of N. Noha Vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 32 of 2017 1 - N. Noha S/o Shri C.R. Sona Aged About 62 Years R/o Plot No. 24, Ayappa Nagar, P.O. Supela Bhilai, District-Durg, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - T.C. Bage S/o Shri Late D.R. Bagde Aged About 67 Years Ayappa Nagar, P.O.

CGHC010036742016

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPC No. 32 of 2017

1 - N. Noha S/o Shri C.R. Sona Aged About 62 Years R/o Plot No. 24, Ayappa Nagar, P.O. Supela Bhilai, District-Durg, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - T.C. Bage S/o Shri Late D.R. Bagde Aged About 67 Years Ayappa Nagar, P.O. Supela, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - T.V. Chandrasekran S/o Late Shri M.K. Padmanabhan Nair Aged About 80 Years R/o Plot No. 21, Ayappa Nagar, Bhilai, District- Durg,chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary Urban Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan Raipur, Post And P.S. Mandir Hasaud District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Commissioner, Nagar Nigam Bhilai, District- Durg,chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Ayyappa Nagar Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti, Ayyapa Nagar Kohka Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

5 - Amrit Lal Khatri S/o Shri Mansa Ram Khatri R/o Sindhi Colony Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 6 - Nagar Palika Nigam Bhilai, Through Commissioner Nagar Nigam Office G.R. Raod, Supela, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, District :

Durg, Chhattisgarh

... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Arvind Dubey, Advocate

For Respondents

No. 1 & 2/State

:

Mr. Sourabh Sahu, P.L.

For Respondents

No. 3 and 6

:

Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate

Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 09/10/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has no instructions in the matter.

2. The aforesaid submission is taken on record.

3. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. Sd/-

(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)

JUDGE Harneet

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead