Chhattisgarh High Court

CRA/2241/2026 of OM PRAKASH SHARMA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:43735 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No.2241 of 2026 1 - Om Prakash Sharma S/o Late Ram Pravesh Sharma Aged About 41 Years R/o Kelo Vihar, Near Main Gate, S.E.C.L. Office, Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.), Aadhar No. 3253-6183-7856 2 - Pushpendra Sahu S/o Shri

CGHC010317732026

2026:CGHC:43735

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

CRA No.2241 of 2026

1 - Om Prakash Sharma S/o Late Ram Pravesh Sharma Aged About 41

Years R/o Kelo Vihar, Near Main Gate, S.E.C.L. Office, Raigarh, Dist.

Raigarh (C.G.), Aadhar No. 3253-6183-7856

2 - Pushpendra Sahu S/o Shri Lakhan Lal Sahu Aged About 53 Years R/o Ward No. 18, Thakurdiya, Kharsiya, Dist Raigarh (C.G.) Aadhar No.

8933-9262-4359

3 - Amrit Lal Shrivas S/o Shri G.R. Shrivas Aged About 43 Years R/o House No. 115, Jaistambh Chouck, Gopalpur, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.)

Aadhar No. 2486-8777-4109

4 - Rajneesh Kumar Tiwari S/o Shri U.P. Tiwari Aged About 43 Years R/o House No. 13 R-4, Kranti Nagar, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) Aadhar No.

3973-3815-2623

Appellant (s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer (S.H.O.) City Kotwali, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.)

2 - Vikas Niganiya S/o Dinesh Niganiya Aged About 37 Years R/o Krishna Vihar Colony, Jindal Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And Dist. Raigarh,

C.G.

Respondent(s)

For Appellant (s)

:

Ms. Priyanshi Gupta, Advocate on behalf of Mr.

Devershi Thakur, Advocate

For Respondent No.1

:

Mr. Vinod Tekam, GA

For Respondent No.2

Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate

Digitally

signed

by R

NIRALA

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 08/10/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants would submit that the appellants do not want to pursue the instant criminal appeal, hence they may be permitted to withdraw the same.

2. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Nirala

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead