Chhattisgarh High Court
WP227/401/2025 of MOHAMMAD SALIM ROKADIYA Vs MOHAMMAD AARIF ROKADIYA on 7 October 2026
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 401 of 2025 1 - Mohammad Salim Rokadiya S/o Mohammad Daud Rokadiya Aged About 49 Years R/o Salhewarpara, Near Old Bones Godown, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Mohammad Aarif Rokadiya S/o Mohammad
CGHC010164262025
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WP227 No. 401 of 2025
1 - Mohammad Salim Rokadiya S/o Mohammad Daud Rokadiya Aged About 49 Years R/o Salhewarpara, Near Old Bones Godown, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Mohammad Aarif Rokadiya S/o Mohammad Daud Rokadiya Aged About 46 Years R/o Akash Ganga Colony, House No. 48, Rudri Road, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 2 - Shahnaz Bano W/o Salim Rokadiya Aged About 45 Years R/o Salhewarpara, Near Old Bones Godown, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh (Respondent/defendant No. 2)
3 - Ayasha Bano W/o Mohammad Daud Rokadiya Aged About 67 Years R/o Salhewarpara, Near Old Bones Godown, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh (Respondent/defendant No. 3)
4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh (Respondent/defendant No. 4)
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate
For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate along with Ms.
A. Sandhya Rao, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Order on Board
08.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties would submit that the parties have entered into compromise and now the petitioner does not want to press the present petition further.
2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika