Chhattisgarh High Court
CONT/419/2026 of MAHESH RAM SAHU Vs SHRI MAYANK CHATURVEDI on 7 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43667 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 419 of 2026 1 - Mahesh Ram Sahu S/o Shri Babu Lal Sahu Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Bagbudva, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg) 2 - Bhagwat Kurre S/o Shri Ganesh Ram Aged About 54 Years R/o Ward No. 1 Sakti,
CGHC010097192026
2026:CGHC:43667
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONT No. 419 of 2026
1 - Mahesh Ram Sahu S/o Shri Babu Lal Sahu Aged About 48 Years R/o Village-
Bagbudva, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
2 - Bhagwat Kurre S/o Shri Ganesh Ram Aged About 54 Years R/o Ward No. 1
Sakti, Harijan Mohalla,block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
3 - Babu Lal Sahu S/o Shri Tarru Ram Sahu Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Gada- Bordi, Block- Kharsia, District- Raigarh (Cg)
4 - Laxmi Narayan S/o Shri Mahesh Ram Ram Aged About 58 Years R/o Ward No.
1, Sakti Harijan Mohalla, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
5 - Mohan Lal Tandan S/o Shri Chhattu Ram Tandan Aged About 44 Years R/o Ward No. 1 Sakti, Harijan Mohalla, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
6 - Sankhi Lal Chandra S/o Shri Mohit Ram Chandra Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Basin Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
7 - Gopal Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Gautam Sahu Aged About 56 Years R/o Village
8 - Raj Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Ram Lal Ram Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Gada-Bordi, Block Kharsia, District - Raigarh (Cg)
9 - Samme Lal Sahu S/o Shri Ramdhan Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Gada-Bordi, Block Kahrsia, District Raigarh (Cg)
10 - Firat Das Mahant S/o Shri Budh Ram Mahant Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Gada-Bordi, Block Kharsia, District Raigarh (Cg)
11 - Vijay Lal Sahu S/o Shri Birbal Sahu Aged About 61 Years R/o Village
Bagbudva, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
12 - Sahesh Ram Sahu S/o Shri Babu Lal Sahu Aged About 43 Years R/o Village
Bagbudva, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
13 - Basant Kumar Kurrey S/o Shri Chhedi Lal Kurrey Aged About 54 Years R/o Ward No. 1 Sakti, Harijan Mohalla, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
14 - Raj Kumar Ratre S/o Shri Pritam Lal Ratre Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Nandeli, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
15 - Balbhadra Parsad Sahu S/o Shri Premsai Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Limtara, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
16 - Chandra Kumar Sahu S/o Late Sant Ram Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Bagbudva, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
17 - Gopal Sidar S/o Shri Shyam Lal Sidar Aged About 44 Years R/o Village
18 - Gopi Ram Gabel S/o Late Dulku Ram Gabel Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Dodki, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
19 - Buddheshwar Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Samme Lal Sahu Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Ragja, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
20 - Chhabi Lal Sahu S/o Shri Birbal Sahu Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Limtara, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
21 - Chhedu Ram Ratre S/o Shri Ram Bharos Ratre Aged About 60 Years R/o Ward No. 1 Sakti, Harijan Mohalla, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
22 - Tukesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Ram Kumar Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Dodki, Block- Sakti, District- Sakti (Cg)
... Petitioners
Versus
1 - Shri Mayank Chaturvedi Collector, District Raigarh (Cg)
... Respondent
For Petitioners
:
Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate
SB:
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER ON BOARD
08/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w. Article 215 of the Constitution of India alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 17.10.2025 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 5460/2025.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order subject matter of contempt has been complied with.
3. In view of the submissions made by the counsel for petitioner, the proceedings initiated against the respondent is dropped. Notices stands discharged. Contempt petition closed. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY