Chhattisgarh High Court
FA(MAT)/145/2026 of RAVNEET SINGH SALUJA Vs RAVNEET KAUR on 7 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43608- DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA(MAT) No. 145 of 2026 Ravneet Singh Saluja S/o Late Kamaljeet Singh Saluja Aged About 28 Years R/o Shyam Nagar Raipur, Police Station- Telibandha, Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.) Mo. No. 8982076668 ... Applicant Versus
CGHC010150242026
2026:CGHC:43608-
DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA(MAT) No. 145 of 2026
Ravneet Singh Saluja S/o Late Kamaljeet Singh Saluja Aged About 28 Years R/o Shyam Nagar Raipur, Police Station- Telibandha, Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.) Mo. No. 8982076668 ... Applicant
Versus
Ravneet Kaur W/o Shri Ravneet Singh Saluja, D/o Sardar Surendar Pal Singh Aged About 28 Years R/o- Career Point Street, Dayalband Bilaspur, Police Station City Kotwali, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Respondent
For Applicant
:
Mr. Ratnesh Agrawal, Advocate, along with appellant in person.
For Respondent
:
Mr. Vivek Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate along with father of the respondent.
DB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge &
Hon’ble Smt. Sushma Sawant, Judge
ORDER ON BOARD
08/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the present first appeal, being FA(MAT) No. 145 of 2026, has been filed challenging only the award of permanent alimony of Rs. 40,00,000/-. He further submits that a child was born out of the relationship between the parties and that the appellant is maintaining the child.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent, submits that as per instructions received from the respondent and her father present in Court, the respondent does not wish to claim permanent alimony and is relinquishing her right to claim the permanent alimony as ordered. Father of the respondent present also stated that her daughter will not claim the alimony, as she some how wants to get rid of the proceedings.
3. In view of the submission made on behalf of the respondent, on instructions in the presence of the respondent’s father, that the respondent does not wish to claim permanent alimony, the appeal to that extent is allowed. The judgment and decree passed by the learned Trial Court of granting a decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(i)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is maintained, however, the judgment and decree granting permanent alimony is set aside.
4. Let the decree be drawn accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) (Sushma Sawant) Judge Judge vaibhav