Chhattisgarh High Court
CONT/1488/2026 of SMT. REKHA YADAV @ SUREKHA YADAV Vs DR. KAPIL DEV DEEPAK on 7 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43744 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1488 of 2026 1. Smt. Rekha Yadav @ Surekha Yadav W/o Late Premlal Yadav Aged About 53 Years R/o Near Nutan High School, Manokamna Hanuman Mandir Bajrang Chowk, Yadav Mohalla, Tikrapara, Raipur District Raipur
CGHC010360282026
2026:CGHC:43744
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONT No. 1488 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Smt. Rekha Yadav @ Surekha Yadav W/o Late Premlal Yadav Aged About 53 Years R/o Near Nutan High School, Manokamna Hanuman Mandir Bajrang Chowk, Yadav Mohalla, Tikrapara, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Mo. No. 62669-97355.
... Petitioner versus
1. Dr. Kapil Dev Deepak Aged About 55 Years Vice Chancellor, Indira Agricultural Inniversity Krishak Nagar, Purena, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent : Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Shashank Thakur, Advocate. SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 08/10/2026
1. Learned counsel for petitioner fairly submits that after fling of this contempt petition, the respondent has passed the order in compliance of the direction issued by the order, subject matter of contempt, and a copy of the same has been served SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI
upon the petitioner three days ago, which he has placed on record along with covering memo dated 07.10.2026.
2. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Perused the order dated 21.8.2026 passed by the respondent pursuant to the order passed in WPS No.3069/2026, which is subject matter of this contempt.
4. In above facts of the case, I do not find any good ground to proceed. Accordingly, this contempt petition is dismissed as not maintainable. However, the petitioner will be at liberty to take recourse of law against the decision so taken by the respondent. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-