Chhattisgarh High Court
WP227/132/2022 of SAMELAL Vs SHANTI DEVI AGRAWAL on 7 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43760 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 132 of 2022 1 - Samelal S/o Tikaitlal Aged About 30 Years 2 - Dori Lal S/o Tikaitlal Aged About 25 Years 3 - Vijay S/o Tikaitlal Aged About 23 Years 4 - Sijay S/o Tikaitlal Aged About 20 Years All R/o Village Kharhari,
CGHC010068052022
2026:CGHC:43760
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WP227 No. 132 of 2022
1 - Samelal S/o Tikaitlal Aged About 30 Years 2 - Dori Lal S/o Tikaitlal Aged About 25 Years 3 - Vijay S/o Tikaitlal Aged About 23 Years 4 - Sijay S/o Tikaitlal Aged About 20 Years All R/o Village Kharhari, Tahsil Kartala, District-Korba, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Shanti Devi Agrawal W/o Late Shri Prabhudayal R/o In-Frontof Agroha Bhawan, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh.
2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Collector, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)
3 - Naib Tahsildar Barpali, Tahsil Kartala, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Korba District (Chhattisgarh)
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title is taken from the CIS)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioners :
Ms Prinyanka Rai, Advocate on behalf
of Shri Karan Bhardwaaj, Advocate
For Respondents/State
:
Shri Manish Kashyap, PL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 08.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that present writ petition is arising out of the revenue proceeding. However, in the dispute, the Civil Suit is already pending before the learned trial Court.
Wp227 132 of 2022 2 Therefore, she does not want to press this petition any more, and prays for withdrawal of the petition.
2. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Petitioner is at liberty to take all the grounds in the said Civil proceeding. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma