Chhattisgarh High Court
CONT/1496/2026 of SHRIRAM CREATIONS THROUGH PROPRIETOR AKASH JAISWAL Vs PADUM SINGH ALMA on 7 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43749 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1496 of 2026 1. Shriram Creations Through Proprietor Akash Jaiswal Aged 36years, S/o Shri Kailash Kumar Jaiwal, R/o - H. No. B- 11, Housing Board Colony, Kachana, Raipur, (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. Padum Singh Alma
CGHC010389222026
2026:CGHC:43749
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONT No. 1496 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Shriram Creations Through Proprietor Akash Jaiswal Aged 36years, S/o Shri Kailash Kumar Jaiwal, R/o - H. No. B- 11, Housing Board Colony, Kachana, Raipur, (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus
1. Padum Singh Alma Currently Posted As Commissioner Excise, Commercial Tax (Excise) Dept., At -North Block, Sector 19, Commercial Tax And G S T Bhawan, First Floor, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur, C.G.
... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Vinay Nagdev, Advocate through virtual mode. SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 08/10/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this contempt petition seeking willful disobedience of the order dated 19.2.2025 passed in WPC No.5651/2024.
2. From perusal of the record, it is apparent that the order, subject matter of contempt, has been passed on 19.2.2025 directing the authority concerned to take decision on SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI
representation of petitioner in accordance with law within 60 days from the receipt thereof. Present contempt petition is filed on 28.9.2026. Even after exclusion of 60 days period the time limit given by this Court, this contempt petition is filed after more than a year. Therefore, in the opinion of this Court, this contempt petition is hopelessly barred. Petitioner ought to have filed contempt petition within a period of one year as provided under Section 20 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, which is extracted herein below for ready reference:- “20. Limitation for actions for contempt.--No court shall initiate any proceedings of contempt, either on its own motion or otherwise, after the expiry of a period of one year from the date on which the contempt is alleged to have been committed."
3. Since the present contempt petition is barred by limitation, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the same. Consequently, the contempt petition is dismissed as barred by limitation. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-