Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3567/2026 of 2050 HEALTH CARE RAIPUR Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 7 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43648 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3567 of 2026 1 - 2050 Health Care Raipur ( A Unit Of Ingenuity And Innovation Globel Eduhealth Pvt. Ltd.) Through Its Director Smruti Ranjan Bal S/o Bulukeshwar Bal Aged About 32 Years Regd. Office - Gate No. 03,
CGHC010239262026
2026:CGHC:43648
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3567 of 2026
1 - 2050 Health Care Raipur ( A Unit Of Ingenuity And Innovation Globel Eduhealth Pvt. Ltd.) Through Its Director Smruti Ranjan Bal S/o Bulukeshwar Bal Aged About 32 Years Regd. Office - Gate No. 03, H.C.R.M. Plaza, Manuas Realty Road, Beside H.R. Tower, Agroha Colony Changurabhata Raipur District Raipur (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Director, Directorate Of Health Services, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur
(C.G.)
3 - Collector, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.)
4 - Chief Medical And Health Officer Raipur District Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Shri Vedant Shadangi, Advocate.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 08/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed against the unjustified action on the part of the respondent authorities as respondent No.4/Chief Medical & Health Officer, Raipur District: Raipur (C.G.), without properly appreciating the grievances raised by the petitioner/ health care organization and in complete disregard to the principles of natural justice, has passed the impugned order dated 15.06.2026 rejecting the contentions as raised in the reply submitted by the petitioner organization thereby directing the petitioner organization to pay a fine of Rs. 20,000/ & immediately closed the petitioner health care organisation.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed I.A. No.2/2026 application for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file afresh if exigency arises.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge
Avinash