Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4930/2026 of SMT. NIRMALA SAHU Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 7 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43605 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4930 of 2026 1 - Smt. Nirmala Sahu W/o Late Radhelal Sahu, Aged About 84 Years 2 - Smt. Sushila Bai Sahu. D/o Late Radhelal Sahu, Aged About 59 Years 3 - Smt. Nandani Sahu D/o Late Radhelal Sahu, Aged About 54 Years, All
CGHC010376302026
2026:CGHC:43605
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4930 of 2026
1 - Smt. Nirmala Sahu W/o Late Radhelal Sahu, Aged About 84 Years 2 - Smt. Sushila Bai Sahu. D/o Late Radhelal Sahu, Aged About 59 Years 3 - Smt. Nandani Sahu D/o Late Radhelal Sahu, Aged About 54 Years, All are Resident Of Village Bharari Tahsil -Takhatpur, District - Bilaspur
(C.G.).
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur, District -Bilaspur (C.G.)
2 - Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)
Tahsildar, Tahsil - Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)
Naib Tahsildar, Tahsil - Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)
5 - Revenue Inspector, Circle -Belpan, Tahsil - Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur
(C.G.)
6 - Patwari, P.H. No.06, Village Pura And Chhirhakapa, Tahsil - Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery)
RUCHI
YADAV
Digitally
signed by
RUCHI
YADAV
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Mirza Hafeez Baig, Advocate
For Respondent/State
: Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, P.L.
SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 08/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the present petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:- “(i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to complete the proceeding of partition of the maps of the above lands of the petitioners within limited period as directed by this Hon'ble Court.
(ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to provide any other relief to the petitioners deemed fit on the fact and circumstances of the instant case may also be granted.”
2. On the last date of hearing, i.e. on 26.09.2026, learned State counsel was directed to seek necessary instructions with regard to the application submitted by the petitioners for partition of the land in question.
3. Today, learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the application submitted by the petitioners shall be considered and decided by the competent authority within a period of 30 days from today, in accordance with law.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned State counsel, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the application submitted by the petitioners for partition of the land in question, in accordance with law, within a period of 30 days from today.
5. Needless to observe that, while considering and deciding the aforesaid application, the competent authority shall take into consideration all the relevant facts and documents available on record and shall pass a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
7. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi