Chhattisgarh High Court
CRR/640/2020 of RAMESH SHUKLA & ORS. Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 6 October 2026
2026:CGHC:43471 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Revision No.640 of 2020 1 - Ramesh Shukla, S/o Padumnath Shukla, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Mohtara, Police Station Kasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 2 – Niket, S/o Krishna Dutt, Aged
CGHC010195822020
2026:CGHC:43471
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Criminal Revision No.640 of 2020
1 - Ramesh Shukla, S/o Padumnath Shukla, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Mohtara, Police Station Kasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
2 – Niket, S/o Krishna Dutt, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Mohtara, Police Station Kasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
3 – Subhasini, W/o Ramesh Shukla, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Mohtara, Police Station Kasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
... Applicants
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Kasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
... Non-Applicant
For Applicants
: None.
For Non-Applicant/State : Shri Saumya Rai, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri
Sudhir Kumar
, Judge
Order on Board
07.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 28.12.2019 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) in Sessions Trial No.70/2019, whereby charges under Sections 363, 302 and 201 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code have been framed against the Applicants, the Applicants have preferred the instant Criminal Revision.
2. None appears for the Applicants nor any representation is made even when the case is called in the second round of hearing.
3. Learned State Counsel submits that the trial has already concluded and the Applicants have been convicted.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing further survives for consideration in the present Revision, which has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Sudhir Kumar)
Judge Priya